A juror in Lindsay Clancy’s Massachusetts murder trial has revealed that she initially believed Clancy was guilty and criminally responsible for killing her three children before changing her position during deliberations.

“Originally, I felt as though she was guilty and she was criminally responsible for it,” the juror said. “And maybe I still believe that in a certain way.”

The juror’s comments came after Clancy’s trial ended in a mistrial on Sept. 4 when the 12-member jury could not reach a unanimous verdict. Clancy had admitted to killing her three children, but her defense argued that she was not criminally responsible because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis at the time. Prosecutors argued that she understood her actions and should be held criminally responsible.

Eleven jurors reportedly supported finding Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity, while one juror remained opposed. Several jurors have since spoken publicly about the deliberations and criticized the holdout for refusing to agree to the insanity verdict despite acknowledging that he had reasonable doubt about Clancy’s guilt.

The juror who changed her vote said she did not closely follow the case and did not pay significant attention to developments surrounding it outside the courtroom. Her account provides another perspective on the disagreements within the jury as members considered competing evidence about Clancy’s mental state.

Clancy was accused of strangling her three children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan, at the family’s Duxbury, Massachusetts, home in January 2023 before attempting suicide. The attempt left her paralyzed. She remains in a state psychiatric facility while prosecutors consider whether to retry the case. A court hearing is scheduled for Sept. 29.

The mistrial leaves the criminal case unresolved. Prosecutors have not announced whether they will pursue another trial.